Anyone else getting deja vu reading the BBC workplace culture review?
Getting flashbacks to the 2013 Respect at Work review done by the same company Change Associates
Busy day in media with the publication of the BBCâs workplace culture review, Alex Mahon stepping down as Channel 4 CEO and reports that production powerhouse Banijay is eyeing up ITV.
None of the above are huge surprises but will keep everyone busy.
So what might get less coverage than normal is that the BBCâs workplace culture review, carried out by Change Associates, has echoes of one carried out in 2013 following the Jimmy Savile scandal - which was also carried out byâŠyou guessed it Change Associates.
There are obviously some key differences but have a look for yourself to see what I mean.
Hereâs todayâs BBC workplace culture review:
And hereâs the 2013 BBC Respect at Work review:
Todayâs report talks about, âLaunching a refreshed and strengthened Code of Conductâ, launching a âResolving Concerns Helplineâ, âIntroducing in-person inductions for all new joinersâ and âTraining all managers on our updated Code of Conduct.â
2013âs report proposed: âRe-launch BBC valuesâ, a âConfidential helplineâ, âCreating a guide to the BBC for all new employeesâ and âRe-visit training and development for managersâ.
The BBC today says the report from Change Associates âfound no evidence of a toxic culture,â but âin a series of detailed findings and recommendations it highlighted key areas for improvementâ. Change Associates also found âthere were a minority of people at the BBC â both on and off-air - who were able to behave unacceptably without it being addressedâ so the BBC will take âimmediate actionâ.
Despite the constructive improvements suggested in the 2013 Respect at Work review and implemented by the BBC, the Huw Edwards scandal happened.
So undoubtedly itâs a good thing the corporation ordered another report and went back to Change Associates for their expert knowledge.
But it begs the question - when will things change (pun intended) and the day come when the BBC doesnât have to ask Change Associates to carry out these kind of reviews?




